Post by account_disabled on May 1, 2024 21:40:43 GMT -6
The results indicated that in both risk types the social exposure increased the proportion of risky selection but its effect was stronger in the rare loss condition. In Study the rare loss task was administered to study participants with a target individual observing the choices of a paired individual. The results showed that observing others rather than being observed led to the pattern of increased risk taking.
The findings of the two studies indicate the importance of distinguishing different types of risky situations and shed light on contradictory findings in the literature..sjdm.org jdm .pdf pdf Was the Wealth of Nations Determined in B.C. by Diego A. Comin William Easterly and Erick Gong To the extent that history Brazil Phone Number List is discussed at all in economic development it is usually either the divergence associated with the Industrial Revolution or the effects of colonial regimes. Is it possible that precolonial preindustrial history also matters significantly for today s national economic development.
The authors find that technology adoption circa A.D. prior to the era of colonization and extensive European contacts predicts approximately percent of cross country differences in both current per capita income and technology in a large cross section of countries. When exploring the causes of this extreme persistence in technology they find evidence in favor of the importance of the effect of current adoption on subsequent adoption as the main driver. This leaves a limited role to country specific factors such as institutions geography or genes to explain the persistence of technology.
The findings of the two studies indicate the importance of distinguishing different types of risky situations and shed light on contradictory findings in the literature..sjdm.org jdm .pdf pdf Was the Wealth of Nations Determined in B.C. by Diego A. Comin William Easterly and Erick Gong To the extent that history Brazil Phone Number List is discussed at all in economic development it is usually either the divergence associated with the Industrial Revolution or the effects of colonial regimes. Is it possible that precolonial preindustrial history also matters significantly for today s national economic development.
The authors find that technology adoption circa A.D. prior to the era of colonization and extensive European contacts predicts approximately percent of cross country differences in both current per capita income and technology in a large cross section of countries. When exploring the causes of this extreme persistence in technology they find evidence in favor of the importance of the effect of current adoption on subsequent adoption as the main driver. This leaves a limited role to country specific factors such as institutions geography or genes to explain the persistence of technology.